An analysis of why AI coding tools like Claude Code and Cursor have captured developer mindshare, exploring their superior UX, effective pricing models, and the shortcomings of competitors like Gemini.
Frustrated with AI coding assistants like ChatGPT and Claude giving you bad code? Discover key strategies for improving their performance, from advanced prompting techniques to proper context management.
Developers compare Super Grok Heavy to models like GPT-4o and Claude for coding tasks. Discover its strengths in bug hunting, its concise output, and how it stacks up against benchmarks.
Developers share their real-world experiences and practical tips for using Claude Code and other AI assistants effectively, covering everything from prompt strategy and language choice to advanced tooling.
Discover the AI developer assistant setups that professionals are actually using to boost productivity. From combining Claude and Copilot to self-hosting models, learn about the workflows that work best in 2025.
Developers are moving away from the Cursor AI editor due to its new data-sharing policies. Discover the privacy-first alternatives they're adopting, including Claude Code and the open-source Continue.dev.
Discover why the way we interact with LLMs—using decomposition, multi-perspective engagement, and a collaborative tone—may be more crucial than perfecting prompts.
Developers compare Claude 3.7, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and GPT-4.1 for coding, documentation, and visual tasks, revealing distinct strengths, weaknesses, and cost considerations.
Developers discuss the pros and cons of AI-powered IDEs versus copy-pasting code into chat apps like ChatGPT, focusing on context management, cost, and workflow integration.
Hacker News users compare AI-powered code editors Cursor and Windsurf, discussing autocomplete, agentic features, context handling, and popular alternatives like Zed, Aider, and VSCode Copilot.