← back home

The VMware Exodus: Navigating Hypervisor Alternatives After Broadcom's Price Hikes

October 27, 2025
Vmware Migration Broadcom Acquisition Hypervisor Alternatives Virtualization Open Source Software Cloud Computing Containerization It Infrastructure Cost Management Vendor Lock-In
View original discussion on Hacker News

The acquisition of VMware by Broadcom has sent ripples through the IT industry, leading to widespread urgency among organizations to explore and adopt alternative virtualization solutions. Driven by significant price hikes and changes in licensing models, many are finding the cost of remaining on VMware prohibitive, prompting a mass exodus.

The Broadcom Effect: Why Organizations Are Migrating

Broadcom's strategy, as widely discussed, involves focusing on a limited number of large enterprise clients (often referred to as Global 2000 companies), while actively shedding smaller and medium-sized businesses. This shift has resulted in dramatic price increases—ranging from 5x to an astonishing 600% in reported cases—making VMware an untenable solution for many. The goal appears to be maximizing revenue from a smaller, high-value customer base, even at the cost of losing a significant portion of the overall customer count. This aggressive approach has made migration not just a strategic consideration, but an urgent financial necessity for many.

Diverse Pathways Off VMware

Organizations are exploring a variety of options, often dictated by their existing infrastructure, budget, and internal expertise:

1. Microsoft Hyper-V

Hyper-V is a leading alternative, particularly for organizations deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem. A significant advantage is that its licensing is often already included with existing Microsoft Enterprise License Agreements (ELAs) or Windows Server Datacenter editions, making it a seemingly "free" or low-cost switch. This is especially attractive for Windows Server-heavy environments. While some concerns exist regarding its orchestration capabilities at scale compared to VMware's vCenter, it addresses many core virtualization needs.

2. Proxmox VE

Proxmox Virtual Environment (VE), an open-source solution built on KVM and LXC, is experiencing a surge in adoption. It's lauded for its cost-effectiveness and comprehensive feature set, including built-in VM firewalls, Proxmox Backup Server (PBS) integration, and Ceph storage support. While highly favored by SMBs and homelab enthusiasts, its perceived lack of a formal 24/7 enterprise-grade Service Level Agreement (SLA) is often cited as a barrier for larger organizations. However, a growing network of qualified Proxmox resellers, many advertising 24x7 support, can bridge this gap. This decentralization of enterprise support is a key differentiator.

3. Nutanix

Nutanix offers a hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution that some view as a spiritual successor to traditional VMware datacenter deployments. It bundles compute, storage, and networking into a single platform and uses a heavily modified KVM hypervisor. While it provides a rich feature set, including replication, and offers tools for simple migration from VMware, it can also be as expensive as, or even more costly than, the previous VMware contracts. Some users have reported issues with VM stability and performance, leading to migrations away from Nutanix as well.

4. KVM-based Open Source Stacks

A broader category of open-source KVM-based solutions provides flexibility and vendor independence:

  • OpenStack: A comprehensive cloud operating system, gaining a "second wind" in the enterprise space. It's powerful but can be complex to deploy and manage, making it more suitable for larger organizations with dedicated teams.
  • Apache CloudStack: Similar to OpenStack, offering a robust platform for managing large-scale virtualized environments. It was considered by some organizations as a way to avoid vendor lock-in.
  • XCP-ng: A fork of Citrix XenServer, now independently developed, offering a VMware-like experience with interesting advancements.
  • Direct KVM/libvirt: Organizations are leveraging KVM directly, often with management frontends like Cockpit or virt-manager on RHEL/Alma/Rocky Linux. This DIY approach offers maximum control but requires significant in-house expertise.
  • Harvester: An open-source hyperconverged infrastructure solution built on KVM and Kubernetes.
  • OpenNebula: Another flexible cloud management platform built on KVM.
  • HP VME (Virtualization Management Environment): Positioned as a cost-effective, near drop-in alternative to VMware, especially for HPE hardware users.

5. Cloud Migration

Many organizations are opting for a "lift-and-shift" migration to public cloud providers like Azure and AWS. For some, even cloud VMs are proving cheaper than the new Broadcom licensing. Cloud providers like OVHcloud are also seeing increased interest, offering competitive pricing, especially for containerized workloads. However, the cost of Windows Server licenses can be higher in some cloud environments, and the long-term cost-effectiveness depends heavily on careful management and optimization.

6. Containerization

A strategic move for many is to containerize applications using technologies like Docker, Podman, and Kubernetes (often with KubeVirt for managing VMs within Kubernetes, or OpenShift for an enterprise-grade Kubernetes platform). This approach reduces the reliance on traditional VM hypervisors by shifting to a container-native paradigm. While it requires application modernization and can face resistance from corporate IT/security policies, it offers significant benefits in terms of portability and resource efficiency. Talos Linux, a hardened OS dedicated to Kubernetes hosting, is mentioned for those seeking a minimized footprint.

7. Bare Metal

For highly specialized workloads, such as High-Performance Computing (HPC) environments, a return to bare metal servers is being considered. This approach bypasses virtualization overhead entirely, providing maximum raw performance for specific use cases.

Critical Considerations for Migration

Migrating from a deeply entrenched virtualization platform like VMware is not without its challenges:

  • Risk Aversion: For large enterprises, the perceived risk of moving legacy applications is often the primary blocker. Lengthy, complex projects are required, necessitating careful planning and execution.
  • Enterprise Support and SLAs: The availability of robust, 24/7 enterprise-grade support is non-negotiable for many mission-critical systems. While open-source projects might not offer this directly, certified resellers and partners often do.
  • Workload Assessment: A thorough understanding of current workloads—whether they are predominantly VMs, container-ready, or suitable for bare metal—is crucial for selecting the right alternative.
  • Vendor Lock-in: There's a cautious approach to avoid jumping from one proprietary vendor lock-in scenario (VMware) into another (e.g., some perceive Nutanix or Red Hat/OpenShift as having similar risks).
  • Corporate Policies and Culture: Internal IT and cybersecurity policies can significantly hinder the adoption of new technologies, even when engineering teams are eager to modernize. Overcoming organizational inertia is a critical step.
  • Total Cost of Ownership: While the upfront cost of migration, including retraining staff, can be substantial, the dramatic price hikes from Broadcom often make these investments pay off quickly over a 3-5 year financial projection.

The current upheaval in the virtualization market presents both significant challenges and opportunities for organizations to re-evaluate their infrastructure strategies, embracing more flexible, cost-effective, and open solutions where possible.

Get the most insightful discussions and trending stories delivered to your inbox, every Wednesday.