Navigating `snapd` on Ubuntu: User Feedback, Performance, and Integration Concerns

The integration of snapd into Ubuntu Desktop continues to be a point of contention for many users, particularly those returning from other Linux distributions. While some casual users report a generally "fine" experience, especially for limited GUI application usage, more experienced users frequently cite several persistent pain points.

Performance and Responsiveness Concerns

One of the most common complaints revolves around performance. Applications installed via snapd can sometimes be noticeably slower to launch or operate compared to their apt-installed counterparts. This performance hit is often attributed to the sandboxed nature of Snaps, which adds a layer of overhead.

Integration Challenges and Inconsistencies

Another significant issue highlighted is the lack of proper integration with the base system. Snaps often fail to honor system-wide configurations, such as themes and fonts, leading to a fragmented and inconsistent user interface experience. This can be particularly frustrating for users who meticulously customize their desktop environment, as it breaks the cohesive look and feel.

System Management and Disk Clutter

From a system management perspective, snapd introduces several complexities. It has been noted that snapd creates a new loop device (virtual volume) for every installed Snap package. This practice can significantly clutter the output of tools like lsblk, making it harder to discern actual physical or logical volumes. Furthermore, the presence of a ~/.snap directory that cannot be easily hidden by design is a specific concern for some, contributing to a feeling of lack of control over their file system.

User Perspectives and Alternatives

For users seeking a cleaner, more integrated, and performant desktop experience, the recommendation often leans towards avoiding snapd entirely or switching to distributions like Debian that do not rely on it. While apt can still be used to fill gaps where Snap versions are problematic or unavailable, the overarching sentiment from a segment of the user base is that snapd introduces more friction than value, particularly for those accustomed to traditional package management. Some users have even reported difficulties in completely removing snapd from their system, leading them to switch distributions altogether.